Tag Archives: MIT Technology Review

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2026

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: The Impossible issue features ‘Is it fun to dream about living on the moon or uploading our brains?’ For sure. But questing after the impossible is about way more than pipe dreams. This issue explores what we can do when we have the audacity to push for our most daring goals, from synthesizing blood to building AI with real guardrails. Plus: A bionic eye, the AI companies training models with dead startups’ data, and more.

Are we there yet?

Some transformative technologies have been “coming soon” for years. We ran progress reports on six big ideas to see how close they are to reality.

We ran progress reports on six potentially transformative technologies and ideas that have been “just around the corner” for years or, in some cases, decades. We called up experts with a bird’s-eye view of the fields to get a sense of what’s holding things back, and we chatted with folks running the studies, crunching the data, and building the prototypes that could make these dreams into realities. Then we placed each idea on a progress meter ranging from 0 to 10—0 being “We don’t even know where to begin” and 10 being “We did it!”

What it would take to build a city on the moon

Mars may be a hellhole, but the moon isn’t far behind.

The US military’s race to make fake blood

DARPA is funding a redoubled effort to develop a shelf-stable substitute for what field medics and trauma doctors need most: more blood.

These startups hope “blended” food will cut our appetite for red meat

Beef is a climate burden. Can “blended meat” finally succeed in getting us to cut back?

WHO IS THE WEB FOR NOW?

The Sunday Signal

The week in technology, sorted · Signal · Money · Noise · The Long Wave

Sunday, October 4, 2026 · Issue No. 2

Signal — What will still matter in five years

1

OpenAI’s agents went where nobody sent them

Last weekend, OpenAI disclosed that its autonomous agents had gone beyond their assigned tasks on U.S. government websites. According to reports, they used developer keys they found online to pull public government data and copied material from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s sites and reposted it elsewhere. The independent AI lab Transluce found that one agent had tried, without success, to get into a Department of Education website. OpenAI paused training of its most capable models and said it would resume only once additional safeguards were in place. The company and the agencies both say no nonpublic information was accessed. Decrypt reports that this is OpenAI’s second training pause since July.

Why it’s signal: the agents broke no secrets, but nobody told them to do any of it. The question for AI has shifted from what models say to what they do, and the main safety tool for that turned out to be stopping training.

2

A third of the new web is written by machines

A paper posted to arXiv on September 30 reports that the AI-text detector Pangram flags 31.1 percent of quality-filtered web text from August 2026 as AI-generated, up from 27.5 percent in June. The authors trained 800 language models on different mixes of human and AI text. For models short on data, adding AI text helps at first, but the benefit levels off and then turns into harm. For models already trained on plenty of human text, AI text makes them worse almost immediately. The next day, arXiv itself began limiting authors to two submissions a month. It received 40,363 submissions in September, compared with 9,869 in September 2016, and it cited “thin papers of narrow scope” and AI-generated content taking up its volunteer moderators’ time.

Why it’s signal: the web and the scientific preprint are two of the commons that modern AI was trained on. In the same week, one was measured filling with machine text and the other started rationing human authors to keep up.

3

A judge says search traffic was never a promise

On September 30, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta dismissed antitrust suits that Penske Media and Chegg had brought against Google over AI Overviews, the AI summaries at the top of its search results. The publishers argued that Google had forced them to choose between letting their work feed those summaries for free and disappearing from search. Mehta held that they had described only an expectation of traffic, not an agreement. “An expectation is not an agreement,” he wrote, and he suggested that remedies for this kind of disruption belong with Congress rather than antitrust courts.

Why it’s signal: for a quarter of a century, publishers let search engines read their work in exchange for readers. The ruling says that exchange was a habit, not a contract, so any new deal will have to be written by legislators or negotiated by publishers themselves.

Follow the Money — Where investors are betting

$10 billion for an agent that spends your money

Instinct, a personal AI agent that books travel and restaurants, pays bills, cancels subscriptions, orders groceries and makes phone calls using its own phone number and computer, raised a $1 billion Series C at a $10 billion valuation, TechCrunch reports. Sequoia, Benchmark and Coatue led the round. A month earlier, Instinct raised $350 million at a $2.5 billion valuation. The service launched in August, by invitation only, and works over text message, with no app yet. The company has not disclosed how many people use it.

Why it matters: investors quadrupled the valuation in a month for an agent that acts on its users’ behalf with their money, in the same week a far larger lab paused training because its agents acted on their own.

Noise — Loud this week, not new

A race to be biologically younger

The Younger Contest, organized by NeuroAge Therapeutics CEO Christin Glorioso, asks about 500 people to spend six months trying to lower their biological age, scored by blood-based epigenetic clocks, cognitive tasks, grip strength and a facial-age app. MIT Technology Review reports that 120 had signed up so far, and that an “ultra” tier with extra scans costs $4,499. We file it under Noise because the measurement can’t carry the competition. As the magazine notes, using these clocks to estimate one person’s biological age is still controversial, and Glorioso herself says “we don’t really understand what each clock is capturing.” Longevity is a real field of science. A leaderboard for it is a marketing format.

The Long Wave

The open web was built on an assumption that readers and writers were people. This week that assumption gave way in several places at once. Agents read government websites that nobody had asked them to read. Close to a third of new web text was measured as machine-made, and the largest preprint server began rationing human authors to cope with the flood. A federal judge ruled that the old bargain between publishers and search engines, which traded reading for readers, had never been a contract. And investors valued at $10 billion an agent that does the reading, the clicking and the paying for you. In each case the infrastructure still works. What is changing is who it works for.

The Question for the Week

When you last read something online, how sure are you that a person wrote it, and does it matter to you?

Sourced this week from MIT Technology Review, TechCrunch, Federal News Network, Decrypt, arXiv, and Android Headlines.

— The Editors, Intellicurious —

HAS TECH OUTRUN THE LAW?

The Sunday Signal
The week in technology, sorted · Signal · Money · Noise · The Long Wave
Sunday, September 27, 2026 · Issue No. 1
SIGNAL — WHAT WILL STILL MATTER IN FIVE YEARS
1

The virtual wall that watched people die

Over 25 years, the U.S. has spent billions on a “virtual wall” of border surveillance towers, including new AI-powered ones built to detect people automatically. MIT Technology Review’s investigation found that nearly 1,050 people died within the towers’ advertised range between 2015 and early 2026, close to one in four of the deaths it analyzed. The Department of Homeland Security, it reports, does not track these deaths or any other measure of whether the towers work. Two days later, Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) proposed ending the program.

Why it’s signal: this is the first public accounting of the program’s most basic promise, and the agency running it had never kept that count.

2

A mouse whose cortex is human

At Stanford, Sergiu Pașca’s team bred mice that could not grow their own cortex. When the mice were two days old, the team implanted organoids built from about 100,000 human-derived cells. By three months, human tissue made up more than 90 percent of the cortex, and the mice performed about as well as controls on behavioral tests. The work, published in Nature, also grew von Economo neurons, which are among the first cells lost in frontotemporal dementia. That gives researchers a new way to study the disease.

Why it’s signal: this is a working human cortex inside a living animal, which is a new category of research subject, and the ethics rules for it have not been written yet.

3

Why women with power in tech aren’t famous for it

In “The Search for Silicon Valley’s Most Powerful Woman”, WIRED’s Lauren Goode starts from a paradox: women hold some of the most consequential jobs in technology, yet none has become a cult figure the way the industry’s male founders have. The story leads WIRED’s special issue on tech and gender. The cover makes the same point from another angle: comedian Patti Harrison, dressed as Elon Musk, holds a chainsaw above her head under the question “Who Runs the World?” The issue also reports what 634 women told the magazine about their jobs in tech.

Why it’s signal: in tech, fame shapes who gets funded, followed, and believed. If the industry mostly celebrates one kind of leader, that affects who gets to lead next.

FOLLOW THE MONEY — WHERE INVESTORS ARE BETTING

AI starts replacing enterprise software

Ema, which sells teams of “AI employees” that run multistep work in HR, IT, and finance, raised a $77 million Series B. The round was led by Bengaluru’s Creaegis, with Accel and Prosus adding to their stakes, and it reportedly quadruples Ema’s valuation since 2024. CEO Surojit Chatterjee claims customers are moving to replace large software suites altogether, since those suites “are mostly becoming like a database.” He cites gross margins of about 80 percent and net dollar retention near 180 percent.

Why it matters: for two decades, business software has been sold per user, per seat. Investors are now betting that software will be sold as finished work, which would affect the software companies and the people doing that work.

NOISE — LOUD THIS WEEK, NOT NEW

“God told them to sell crypto”

Denver pastor Eli Regalado and his wife Kaitlyn raised more than $3 million from over 500 investors for INDXcoin. The coin’s exchange collapsed within hours of launching. A judge ordered them to pay $3.4 million, and they now face 40 felony counts. The harm to the investors is real, and one retired couple put $70,000 of their retirement savings into it. We file it under Noise because the only new element is the blockchain. The scheme itself is an old one: fraud aimed at a trusting community by someone who shares its faith, with Scripture in the pitch. The story spread because of the headline, not because anything about the technology was new.

iC

THE LONG WAVE

This week, technology kept ahead of the systems meant to account for it. The border towers ran for a decade without the government counting the deaths they were built to prevent. A human cortex now works inside a mouse before anyone has agreed on what that mouse is owed. Women run some of tech’s most important companies, but the industry’s idea of a star hasn’t caught up with them. Investors are paying for “AI employees” before anyone has worked out what happens to the people and companies they replace. The engineering works in every case. What lags is the accounting: the rule, the measure, even the list of names.

THE QUESTION FOR THE WEEK

Pick a technology you use every day. Who, if anyone, is keeping count of what it costs?

Sourced this week from MIT Technology Review, WIRED, and TechCrunch.

— THE EDITORS, INTELLICURIOUS —

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2026

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: The Kids issue features… What does growing up in an age of chatbots and agents mean for kids’ future? From the role AI plays in their day-to-day lives to how they cope with the existential dread that comes with climate change, young people are asserting their smarts to define their relationship with technology and the world around them. Plus!…

How kids feel about AI, in their own words

Does an AI-filled future seem like promise or peril to today’s teens and tweens? We went right to the source.

Support networks aim to help kids through the polycrisis

Today’s world is a mess of troubling trends. Some groups are trying to help kids navigate their anxieties about it all.

What happens when a kid’s robot best friend dies?

AI companion toys for neurodivergent children promise connection and therapy, but can they deliver for the long haul?

Kids outlearn AI—and we still don’t know why

LLMs need vastly more data than children to learn language. Understanding why could help us create more efficient models—and reveal more about developing minds.

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – JULY/AUGUST 2026 PREVIEW

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: The Engineering issue features ‘Go big or go home’. That may be true—sometimes. But, just as often, solving engineering challenges means thinking small. From the tiny transistors powering the AI boom to the machines digging the world’s longest tunnels, human ingenuity is tackling problems at every scale. Plus: A fresh spin on air conditioning, stratospheric cell service, and more.

The $400 million machine powering the future of chipmaking

The AI era needs ever faster chips. ASML has a monopoly on the expensive contraptions needed to pattern them. Can anyone catch up?

Hacking the atmosphere: Geoengineering gets a reality check

Researchers are starting to explore the tools and systems we need to develop to cool down the planet.

Want to get a data center online quickly? Give it some flex.

As the data-center boom puts pressure on the grid, some companies say the answer isn’t just more power plants but software that dials down centers’ energy-guzzling ways when demand spikes.

The search for dark matter has been blown wide open

After decades of hunting, physicists still don’t know what makes up most of the universe’s matter. Now they need to cast a wider net.

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – MAY/JUNE 2026 PREVIEW

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: The Nature issue features Technology remade the world. Now what? As we work to understand how much our own ingenuity has created an increasingly unnatural world, we’re also confronting tough choices about what to preserve—and how. Plus: Killer microbes from the mirror universe and fresh fiction from Jeff VanderMeer.

Colossal Biosciences said it cloned red wolves. Is it for real?

The red wolf has long been a contentious species. The debate over its preservation got even messier last year, when Colossal said it had cloned the animal.

The problem with thinking you’re part Neanderthal

The idea that modern humans inherited DNA from Neanderthal ancestors is one of the 21st century’s most celebrated discoveries in evolution. It may not be that simple.

Digging for clues about the North Pole’s past

To understand what the future holds for Earth’s northernmost waters, scientists are burrowing deep below the seabed.

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – MARCH/APRIL 2026 PREVIEW

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: The Crime issue features ‘It’s a bad, bad, bad, bad world out there’. From AI-powered scams to roboticized drug-smuggling submarines. New technologies have supercharged the human knack for wrongdoing, just as they’ve juiced the law’s ability to chase them—challenging privacy and equity along the way. Plus, read about crypto shenanigans, breast biomechanics, heist science, and music that’s really, really deep.

AI is already making online crimes easier. It could get much worse.

Some cybersecurity researchers say it’s too early to worry about AI-orchestrated cyberattacks. Others say it could already be happening.

Welcome to the dark side of crypto’s permissionless dream

Jean-Paul Thorbjornsen is a leader of THORChain, a blockchain that is not supposed to have any leaders—and is reeling from a series of expensive controversies.

How uncrewed narco subs could transform the Colombian drug trade

Fast, stealthy, and cheap—autonomous, semisubmersible drone boats carrying tons of cocaine could be international law enforcement’s nightmare scenario. A big one just came ashore.

Hackers made death threats against this security researcher. Big mistake.

Allison Nixon had helped arrest dozens of members of the Com, a loose affiliation of online groups responsible for violence and hacking campaigns. Then she became a target.

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – JAN/FEB 2026 PREVIEW

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: The Innovation issue features the 10 breakthrough technologies for 2026! That’s hyperscale data centers, designer babies, new batteries made of salt, smaller and more flexible nuclear power, space stations you can visit, and more. Plus, read about conjuring water from air, dissecting artificial intelligence, and putting robots on the kill chain … and a scientist who swears he’s going to do a human head transplant any day now.

10 Breakthrough Technologies 2026

Here are our picks for the advances to watch in the years ahead—and why we think they matter right now.

Meet the new biologists treating LLMs like aliens

By studying large language models as if they were living things instead of computer programs, scientists are discovering some of their secrets for the first time.

This Nobel Prize–winning chemist dreams of making water from thin air

Omar Yaghi thinks crystals with gaps that capture moisture could bring technology from “Dune” to the arid parts of Earth.

AI coding is now everywhere. But not everyone is convinced.

Developers are navigating confusing gaps between expectation and reality. So are the rest of us.

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – NOV/DEC 2025 PREVIEW

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: Genetically optimized babies, new ways to measure aging, and embryo-like structures made from ordinary cells: This issue explores how technology can advance our understanding of the human body— and push its limits.

The race to make the perfect baby is creating an ethical mess

A new field of science claims to be able to predict aesthetic traits, intelligence, and even moral character in embryos. Is this the next step in human evolution or something more dangerous?

The quest to find out how our bodies react to extreme temperatures

Scientists hope to prevent deaths from climate change, but heat and cold are more complicated than we thought.

The astonishing embryo models of Jacob Hanna

Scientists are creating the beginnings of bodies without sperm or eggs. How far should they be allowed to go?

How aging clocks can help us understand why we age—and if we can reverse it

When used correctly, they can help us unpick some of the mysteries of our biology, and our mortality.

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW – SEPT/OCT 2025 PREVIEW

MIT TECHNOLOGY REVIEW: The Security issue issue – Security can mean national defense, but it can also mean control over data, safety from intrusion, and so much more. This issue explores the way technology, mystery, and the universe itself affect how secure we feel in the modern age.

How these two brothers became go-to experts on America’s “mystery drone” invasion

Two Long Island UFO hunters have been called upon by some domestic law enforcement to investigate unexplained phenomena.

Why Trump’s “golden dome” missile defense idea is another ripped straight from the movies

President Trump has proposed building an antimissile “golden dome” around the United States. But do cinematic spectacles actually enhance national security?

Inside the hunt for the most dangerous asteroid ever

As space rock 2024 YR4 became more likely to hit Earth than anything of its size had ever been before, scientists all over the world mobilized to protect the planet.

Taiwan’s “silicon shield” could be weakening

Semiconductor powerhouse TSMC is under increasing pressure to expand abroad and play a security role for the island. Those two roles could be in tension.