From a London Review of Books online review:
Quichotte opens with a brilliant parody of Cervantesâs first sentence: âThere once lived, at a series of temporary addresses across the United States of America, a travelling man of Indian origin, advancing years, and retreating mental powers.â The temporary addresses are a fine revision of Cervantesâs pretending not to remember the name of the place where Quixote lived â literally, he says he doesnât want to remember. But in spite of this and many other echoes, Quichotte is not all that close to the original Don Quixote in style or mood, and doesnât seek to be. The leading character chooses his pseudonym because a recording of Massenetâs opera Don Quichotte was his fatherâs favourite LP, and echoes of the musical Man of La Mancha, with the obligatory âimpossible dreamâ, are all over the place.
Cervantes tells us that Don Quixote lost his mind because he read too many romances of chivalry, not all nonsense, as many critics assume, but not models of realism either; yet there are indications, as the novel develops, that Quixote has learned to play at madness, like Hamlet, because it seems to work, because a functioning pretence of knighthood is better than staying at home. Quichotte largely follows the romantic reading of the knight as idealist, whose madness consists of his nobility of spirit and his refusal to believe that the pragmatically possible is an acceptable limit to human behaviour. Rushdie is both mocking and celebrating this posture, and his Quichotte is genuinely ridiculous as well as heroic. He has other sources too, he tells us in his acknowledgments, and both Pinocchio and The Conference of the Birds play a considerable role in the plot. Itâs good to see Jiminy Cricket speaking Italian.
To read more:Â https://www.lrb.co.uk/v41/n17/michael-wood/the-profusion-effect